Friday, December 8, 2017

The submitter mentioned post #1 of a trail .... whoop. ..


The submitter mentioned post #1 of a trail .... whoop. ..

3 comments:

  1. As a country that has many hundreds of thousands of footpath signs which are all standardised as per the law on footpath demarcation .... I assume that the trail name is the first couple of words ... and the extension is self explanatory.
    So in the UK it's unlikely to get published in the same way road signs can't be a thing. There though ... it is a basic information sign. I can only think the factors at play are ...

    1. Cannot locate on street view and it's a fairly remote location.

    2. Oposing faction numbers are skewing submission reviews because they outweigh same faction input.

    3. Reviewers have seen a few of these in the same area and are attempting to avoid a chain of the same post, same detail, 200 yards apart, for miles.

    4. All and more of the above

    You can add a photo sphere to Google by downloading the app. This will add it to street view. Then submit.

    Include in the description details on how to locate the trail path for verification. Avoid using urls but you can name the website it will be found on.

    Ask people of your faction to name your location as their additional review location.

    But I'd give that 3 to 4 stars depending on portal density in the area. Good luck.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Adam SMITH. It won't be on Street View, so I'm going to add a couple of street view panoramas to help. It'l not particularly remote, being in a small bushland in suburbia. So far none have been approved, so it can't be a duplicate thing, and everything else in the area is being approved so no real issues with factional bias. Might just have to live with it.

    ReplyDelete